Gesture Projection and Cosuppositions
Philippe Schlenker
November 2017
 

In dynamic theories of presupposition, a trigger pp' (e.g. it stopped raining) with presupposition p (it rained) and at-issue component p' (it doesn't now rain) comes with a requirement that p should be entailed by the local context of pp'. We argue that some co-speech gestures should be analyzed within a presuppositional framework, but with a twist: an expression p co-occurring with a co-speech gesture G with content g comes with the requirement that the local context of p should guarantee that p entails g; we call such assertion-dependent presuppositions 'cosuppositions'. We show that this analysis can be combined with earlier theories of local contexts (e.g. Heim 1983, Schlenker 2009) to account for complex patterns of gesture projection in quantified and in attitudinal contexts, and we compare our account to two potential alternatives: one based on supervaluations, and one that treats co-speech gestures as supplements (Ebert and Ebert 2014). We argue that the latter is correct, but for 'post-speech' gestures (= gestures that come after the expressions they modify), rather than for co-speech gestures.
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/002645
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: To appear in Linguistics & Philosophy
keywords: co-speech gestures, presuppositions, cosuppositions, projection problem for co-speech gestures, semantics
previous versions: v11 [September 2017]
v10 [August 2017]
v9 [May 2017]
v8 [May 2017]
v7 [January 2017]
v6 [January 2017]
v5 [January 2017]
v4 [August 2016]
v3 [December 2015]
v2 [August 2015]
v1 [August 2015]
Downloaded:2601 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]