The pragmatics of attraction: Explaining unquotation in direct and free indirect discourse
Emar Maier
December 2017
 

The quotational theory of free indirect discourse postulates that pronouns and tenses are systematically unquoted. But where does this unquotation come from? Based on cases of apparent unquotation in direct discourse constructions (including data from Kwaza speakers, Catalan signers, and Dutch children), I suggest a general pragmatic answer: unquotation is essentially a way to resolve a conflict that arises between two opposing constraints. On the one hand, the reporter wants to use indexicals that refer directly to the most salient speech act participants and their surroundings (Attraction). On the other hand, the semantics of direct discourse (formalized here in terms of event modification) entails the reproduction of referring expressions from the original utterance being reported (Verbatim). Unquotation (formalized here also in terms of event modification), allows the reporter to avoid potential conflicts between these constraints. Unquotation in free indirect discourse then comes out as a special case, where the salient source of attraction is the story protagonist and her actions, rather than the reporting narrator and his here and now.
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/002966
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: In "The Semantics and Pragmatics of Quotation", P. Saka and M. Johnson (eds.), Springer 2017
keywords: quotation, direct discourse, free indirect discourse, event semantics, sign language, role shift, child language, semantics
previous versions: v4 [August 2016]
v3 [August 2016]
v2 [May 2016]
v1 [May 2016]
Downloaded:2043 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]