Dependent case and clitic dissimilation in Yimas
Michelle Yuan
September 2019
 

Baker (2015) suggests that the dependent theory of case (Marantz 1991, a.o.) is a formulation of the intuition that morphological case functions to differentiate nominals. This paper presents novel evidence for this idea from the agreement system of Yimas. Departing from previous characterizations of the language, this paper argues that the Yimas agreement morphemes are actually doubled pronominal clitics, and that they exhibit paradigmatic alternations that parallel the distributions of dependent case on nominals crosslinguistically. Crucially, clitic doubling in Yimas is optional; once this is taken into account, it is revealed that the morphological form of a given clitic covaries with the total number of clitics present, even when the sentence-level syntax is held constant: how a clitic is realized is thus dependent on its clitic environment. This context-dependence is analyzed as a dissimilation process, which applies to distinguish between multiple morphosyntactically indistinguishable clitics; this arises whenever multiple DPs are doubled. Thus, both clitic dissimilation in Yimas and dependent case on nominals can be viewed as alternations that are controlled by morphosyntactic context, albeit in different structural domains.
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/003134
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: Natural Language & Linguistic Theory [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09458-7]
keywords: dependent case, clitic doubling, yimas, syntax, morphology, dissimilation
previous versions: v4 [June 2019]
v3 [December 2017]
v2 [September 2016]
v1 [September 2016]
Downloaded:1794 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]