Is Universal Grammar ready for retirement? A short review of a longstanding misinterpretation
Jose-Luis Mendivil-Giro
March 2017
 

In this paper I consider recent studies that deny the existence of Universal Grammar (UG), and I show how the concept of UG that is attacked in these works is quite different from Chomsky’s, and thus that such criticisms are not valid. My principal focus is on the notions of “linguistic specificity” and of “innateness”, and I conclude that, since the controversy about UG is based on misinterpretations, it is rendered sterile and thus does unnecessary harm to linguistic science. I also address the underlying reasons for these misunderstandings and suggest that, once they have been clarified, there is much scope for complementary approaches that embrace different research traditions within current theoretical linguistics.
Format: [ pdf ]
Reference: lingbuzz/003352
(please use that when you cite this article)
Published in: To appear in Journal of Linguistics
keywords: universal grammar, faculty of language, linguistic specificity, nativism, recursion, syntax
Downloaded:869 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]