Indirect reports in Modern Eastern Armenian
Alessandra Giorgi, Sona Haroutyunian
October 2017 

In this work we consider the distribution of complementizers in Modern Eastern Armenian. There are two complementizers: wor and t‘e. They both introduce complement clauses, but t‘e also expresses a dubitative value, implying that the speaker has doubts on the content following the complementizer. Moreover, t‘e, when embedded under verbs of saying, shifts the anchoring of indexicals, moving the anchor from the speaker – better called utterer – to the subject of the saying predicate. On the basis of this and further evidence coming from the analysis of sequence of tense and if-clauses, we will argue that the position of t‘e in the left periphery of the clause occupies a high position in the syntactic hierarchy. The aim of this work is on one hand, a better understanding of indirect reports and their syntax and, on the other, a more precise characterization of indexicals across languages.

Format:	[ pdf ]
Reference:	lingbuzz/003699 (please use that when you cite this article)
Published in:	submitted
keywords:	complementizers, evaluative, dubitative, direct discourse, indirect discourse, indexicality, pronouns, syntax
Downloaded:	470 times

 

[ edit this article | back to article list ]